1. The Third Man
2. Lawrence of Arabia
3. The Bridge on the River Kwai
4. Monty Python and the Holy Grail
5. A Clockwork Orange
6. 2001: A Space Odyssey
7. Trainspotting
8. Life of Brian
9. The Red Shoes
10. Stairway to Heaven
11. Brief Encounter
12. Barry Lyndon
13. Repulsion
14. The Fallen Idol
15. Naked
16. The Servant
17. The Innocents
18. The Ladykillers (1955)
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Adopted two new pups.
Quickpost this image to Myspace, Digg, Facebook, and others!Our old chocolate lab died in April 20, 2008. We got these two yesterday. We're thinking about keeping both of them. Ones a male and the other female. I thought of naming them after planets, Neptune and Saturn, but that fell through. Other names we thought of were Onyx and Ruby.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Obama and the New Party
Two weeks ago at RedState, we documented Obama’s 1996 endorsement by the New Party. A review of the New Party establishes that not only was the party an amalgamation of far left groups, but Barack Obama knew that when he sought the party’s endorsement.
Most of the New Party’s history has been lost in the digital age. It was established in 1992 and started to die out in 1998, well before Google and the modern web were established. But through lengthy searches of the Nexis archive and microfilm at the local university library, I’ve been able to piece this together.
The New Party was established in 1992 “by union activist Sandy Pope and University of Wisconsin professor Joel Rogers,” USA Today reported on November 16, 1992. The paper wrote that the new party was “self-described [as] ‘socialist democratic.’”
The seeds, however, had been sown all the way back in 1988. Quoting John Nichols in the March 22, 1998 issue of In These Times, “The roots of the New Party go back to the aftermath of Jesse Jackson’s run for president in 1988. At that time, Dan Cantor, who had served as labor coordinator for the Jackson campaign, and University of Wisconsin sociology professor Joel Rogers began talking about how to formulate an alternative between the increasingly indistinguishable Democratic-Republican monolith.”
Joel Rogers sought to use the idea of “fusion” as a way to get the New Party into power.
Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let’s call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’s New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.
The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. “After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century …. In 1996, it helped Chicago’s Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district …. The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued.”
Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.
On December 1, 1994, after the Gingrich revolution swept the Democrats from congress and forced Bill Clinton to triangulate, the Chicago Tribune ran an article by Steve Mills entitled “Looking for the Left: The Old Progressives and Marxists Still Breathe Idealist Fire, but They’re Too Splintered to Generate Any Heat.”
“‘The Left is in crisis, and it has been for some time,’ said Carl Davidson, the former national secretary for the radical Students for a Democratic Society. ‘I don’t know if it’s even bottomed out yet,’” he reported to Mr. Mills. Mills continued, “The Socialist Workers Party is in this corner; the International Socialist Organization is in this one. The [communist group Committee of Correspondence] is in another. The radicals, or even the liberals with some radical leanings -- so-called ‘soft radicals’ -- seem to find it hard to abandon individual issues for a broader movement.”
But, Mills reported, “It is amid this political confusion that The New Party would like to step in. ‘If there’s anything that defines the American Left, it’s fragmentation,’ said Dan Cantor, the party’s national organizer.… The New Party aims to change that. By uniting the progressives behind a cohesive ideology, one that, in theory at least, will have room for all the factions that now litter the landscape of the Left, The New Party is confident progressives can again be strong.”
In 1995, the New Ground, the newsletter of the Chicago Chapter of Democratic Socialists of America, noted, “In Chicago, the New Party's biggest asset and biggest liability is ACORN.
“Like most organizations, ACORN is a mixed bag. On one hand, in Chicago, ACORN is a group that attempts to organize some of the most depressed communities in the city. Chicago organizers for ACORN and organizers for SEIU Local 880 have been given modest monthly recruitment quotas for new New Party members. On the other hand, like most groups that depend on canvassing for fundraising, it's easy enough to find burned out and disgruntled former employees. And ACORN has not had the reputation for being interested in coalition politics -- until recently and, happily, not just within the New Party.”
Naturally, Barack Obama was an active part of ACORN at the time, helping it legally in court and helping it organize voters. By 1996, ACORN and the New Party were essentially the same body. Along with the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party endorsed Barack Obama in his State Senate bid.
Obama began seeking the New Party endorsement in 1995. He had been running in a four way primary against his former boss, Senator Alice Palmer, herself a far left radical, and two other individuals. But an election law quirk gave Obama the upper hand. In order to get on the ballot, candidates had to collect signatures of voters. Printed names were not allowed. Obama challenged the petitions of his rivals and was able to get every one of them thrown off the ballot. By the time the ballot was drawn up for the 1996 election, Obama’s was the only name in the race.
Nonetheless, Obama still coveted the New Party endorsement. The New Party required candidates who received the endorsement sign a pledge of support for the party. Obama did not need to support a party that was, in effect, a front group for communists; yet he still chose to. The July issue of the New Ground noted that 15% of the New Party consisted of Democratic Socialists of America members and a good number of Committee of Correspondence members.
Barack Obama, not needing to, chose to affiliate himself with this band of quasi-communists. As the nation moves closer to the election, it is clear that Obama chose to affiliate with assorted anti-American radicals. Machiavelli once noted that we can know a leader by the people he surrounds himself with. What does that say about Barack Obama, who chose to surround himself with people committed to overthrowing the United States and capitalism? American Negro in the Communist Party
Most of the New Party’s history has been lost in the digital age. It was established in 1992 and started to die out in 1998, well before Google and the modern web were established. But through lengthy searches of the Nexis archive and microfilm at the local university library, I’ve been able to piece this together.
The New Party was established in 1992 “by union activist Sandy Pope and University of Wisconsin professor Joel Rogers,” USA Today reported on November 16, 1992. The paper wrote that the new party was “self-described [as] ‘socialist democratic.’”
The seeds, however, had been sown all the way back in 1988. Quoting John Nichols in the March 22, 1998 issue of In These Times, “The roots of the New Party go back to the aftermath of Jesse Jackson’s run for president in 1988. At that time, Dan Cantor, who had served as labor coordinator for the Jackson campaign, and University of Wisconsin sociology professor Joel Rogers began talking about how to formulate an alternative between the increasingly indistinguishable Democratic-Republican monolith.”
Joel Rogers sought to use the idea of “fusion” as a way to get the New Party into power.
Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let’s call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’s New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.
The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. “After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century …. In 1996, it helped Chicago’s Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district …. The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued.”
Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.
On December 1, 1994, after the Gingrich revolution swept the Democrats from congress and forced Bill Clinton to triangulate, the Chicago Tribune ran an article by Steve Mills entitled “Looking for the Left: The Old Progressives and Marxists Still Breathe Idealist Fire, but They’re Too Splintered to Generate Any Heat.”
“‘The Left is in crisis, and it has been for some time,’ said Carl Davidson, the former national secretary for the radical Students for a Democratic Society. ‘I don’t know if it’s even bottomed out yet,’” he reported to Mr. Mills. Mills continued, “The Socialist Workers Party is in this corner; the International Socialist Organization is in this one. The [communist group Committee of Correspondence] is in another. The radicals, or even the liberals with some radical leanings -- so-called ‘soft radicals’ -- seem to find it hard to abandon individual issues for a broader movement.”
But, Mills reported, “It is amid this political confusion that The New Party would like to step in. ‘If there’s anything that defines the American Left, it’s fragmentation,’ said Dan Cantor, the party’s national organizer.… The New Party aims to change that. By uniting the progressives behind a cohesive ideology, one that, in theory at least, will have room for all the factions that now litter the landscape of the Left, The New Party is confident progressives can again be strong.”
In 1995, the New Ground, the newsletter of the Chicago Chapter of Democratic Socialists of America, noted, “In Chicago, the New Party's biggest asset and biggest liability is ACORN.
“Like most organizations, ACORN is a mixed bag. On one hand, in Chicago, ACORN is a group that attempts to organize some of the most depressed communities in the city. Chicago organizers for ACORN and organizers for SEIU Local 880 have been given modest monthly recruitment quotas for new New Party members. On the other hand, like most groups that depend on canvassing for fundraising, it's easy enough to find burned out and disgruntled former employees. And ACORN has not had the reputation for being interested in coalition politics -- until recently and, happily, not just within the New Party.”
Naturally, Barack Obama was an active part of ACORN at the time, helping it legally in court and helping it organize voters. By 1996, ACORN and the New Party were essentially the same body. Along with the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party endorsed Barack Obama in his State Senate bid.
Obama began seeking the New Party endorsement in 1995. He had been running in a four way primary against his former boss, Senator Alice Palmer, herself a far left radical, and two other individuals. But an election law quirk gave Obama the upper hand. In order to get on the ballot, candidates had to collect signatures of voters. Printed names were not allowed. Obama challenged the petitions of his rivals and was able to get every one of them thrown off the ballot. By the time the ballot was drawn up for the 1996 election, Obama’s was the only name in the race.
Nonetheless, Obama still coveted the New Party endorsement. The New Party required candidates who received the endorsement sign a pledge of support for the party. Obama did not need to support a party that was, in effect, a front group for communists; yet he still chose to. The July issue of the New Ground noted that 15% of the New Party consisted of Democratic Socialists of America members and a good number of Committee of Correspondence members.
Barack Obama, not needing to, chose to affiliate himself with this band of quasi-communists. As the nation moves closer to the election, it is clear that Obama chose to affiliate with assorted anti-American radicals. Machiavelli once noted that we can know a leader by the people he surrounds himself with. What does that say about Barack Obama, who chose to surround himself with people committed to overthrowing the United States and capitalism? American Negro in the Communist Party
Thursday, June 19, 2008
A little older, but I'm game
I have 100+ PC games and their specs don't come close to G80s except for Crysis, but it's been 2 yrs now (7 months for the G80 SLI in the Tigershark) and I have got to get me another PC game like Mass Effect (DX9.0c) and I will by next month or the month after that, because I want to.
This discussion; however, is about the Geforce GTX 280 (Geforce 10 to those ppl who lived under a rock) and I am buying one today, yet it's not nighttime yet. It costs like nine $60 PS3 titles + one $20 PS3 title.
Why? Oh because I feel technology is changing. There is like millions and millions of gamers in this country alone? No one will probably care....UNLESS, I get SLI config by Christmas. If you want someone to comment on my blog then I should get a Tri-SLI config of these GTX 280s, but since my power supply won't generate that much power.
SLI for me thou.
This will extend the life of my
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Systemax Tigershark.
Comments please. I benchmark! Don't want the competition pass me buy with their $10 hourly wage and I can definitely emulate PCSX2 and play Crysis Warhead with SLI.
tech specs
core clock 602 MHz
shader clock 1296 MHz
texture fill rate 48.2 billion
processor cores: 280
memory data rate: 2214 MHz
memory interface: 512-bit
memory bandwidth 147 GBytes /second
HDMI 1.3
Quickpost this image to Myspace, Digg, Facebook, and others!
This discussion; however, is about the Geforce GTX 280 (Geforce 10 to those ppl who lived under a rock) and I am buying one today, yet it's not nighttime yet. It costs like nine $60 PS3 titles + one $20 PS3 title.
Why? Oh because I feel technology is changing. There is like millions and millions of gamers in this country alone? No one will probably care....UNLESS, I get SLI config by Christmas. If you want someone to comment on my blog then I should get a Tri-SLI config of these GTX 280s, but since my power supply won't generate that much power.
SLI for me thou.
This will extend the life of my
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Systemax Tigershark.Comments please. I benchmark! Don't want the competition pass me buy with their $10 hourly wage and I can definitely emulate PCSX2 and play Crysis Warhead with SLI.
tech specs
core clock 602 MHz
shader clock 1296 MHz
texture fill rate 48.2 billion
processor cores: 280
memory data rate: 2214 MHz
memory interface: 512-bit
memory bandwidth 147 GBytes /second
HDMI 1.3
Quickpost this image to Myspace, Digg, Facebook, and others!
Top 65 Cartoons
65. Doug (1991–1994; 1996–1999) Could be boring sometimes.
64. Felix the Cat (1958-1961)
63. Hey Arnold! (1996–2004)
62. Recess (1997–2003)
61. Snorks (1984–1988)
60. Goof Troop (1992–1993)
59. Rugrats (1991-1994; 1996-2004)
58. Dexter's Laboratory (1996–-1998; 2001–2003)
57. Bobby's World (1990–1998) Howie Mandel with a mullet, priceless.
56. Rocko's Modern Life (1993–1996)
55. The Angry Beavers (1997–2001)
54. Beetlejuice (1989–1991) Not nearly as good as the movie.
53. Taz-Mania (1991–1993)
52. Johnny Bravo (1997–2004)
51. Inspector Gadget (1983–1986)
50. Jim Henson's Muppet Babies (1984–1990)
49. The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack (2008-present) Stumbled upon this one day, I find it very funny, my wife finds it very weird.
48. The Magic School Bus (1994–1997) Kids show, and educational, yes; but, very charming.
47. Samurai Jack (2001-2004) Great animation.
46. TaleSpin (1990–1994)
45. Schoolhouse Rock! (1973-1986)
44. Voltron (1984–1985) Not nearly as good as Transformers.
43. The Tick (1994–1996) Spoon!
42. Space Ghost Coast to Coast (1994–2004) Hilarious.
41. Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids (1972–1984)
40. Garfield and Friends (1988–1994)
39. G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (1985–1986; 1989–1992)
38. DragonBallZ (1997-2003) Great action, when they actually get to the fighting, and stop talking.
37. Daria (1997–2002)
36. CatDog (1998–2002)
35. The Oblongs (2001-2004) Why so few episodes?
34. The Jetsons (1962-1963; 1984-1985 and 1987)
33. Heathcliff (1984-1987)
32. Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers (1989–1990)
31. Disney's Adventures of the Gummi Bears (1985–1990)
30. Justice League (2001-2004) Great action.
29. Dennis the Menace (1986–1988)
28. Alvin and the Chipmunks (1983–1990)
27. Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008-present) Real possibilities.
26. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987–1996)
25. DuckTales (1987–1990) I want to swim in a bank full of coins, so bad.
24. The Ren and Stimpy Show (1991–1996) Very odd, but that's what made it funny.
23. X-Men (1992–1997) Better than the movies?
22. Tiny Toon Adventures (1991–1994)
21. Family Guy (1999–2002; 2005–present) Used to be much better than it is now.
20. Arthur (1996–present) Yes, it's a kids show, but there is a LOT of hidden humor in it.
19. The Transformers (1984–1987)
18. He-Man and the Masters of the Universe (1983–1985)
17. Thundercats (1985–1989)
16. Avatar: The Last Airbender (2005-2008) Hope the movies turns out to be good.
15.The Smurfs (1981–1990)
14. Batman: The Animated Series (1992–1995) Awesome animation, very dark, but engaging.
13. Yogi Bear (1958–1988)
12. Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! (1969–1972)
11. SpongeBob SquarePants (1999-present) I think SpongeBob's facial expressions are one of the best parts of the show.
10. Beavis and Butt-head (1993–1997) So dumb it's funny.
9. Animaniacs (1993–1998) Classic skits, like Pinky and the Brain.
8. Futurama (1999–2003; 2008–present) Best character? Bender.
7. South Park (1997-present) Offends everyone equally.
6. The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show (1959–1973)
5. The Flintstones (1960–1966)
4. Tom and Jerry (1940-1958) Classic cat and mouse.
3. King of the Hill (1997–2009) Very dry sense of humor.
2. The Simpsons (1989–present) Modern day classic. Missed out on the top spot because some episodes haven't been so good (i.e. anything starring Lisa).
Hanna Barbara cartoons
1. Looney Tunes (1930-1969) Greatest cartoon of all time.
9. The Quick Draw McGraw Show
8. The Huckleberry Hound Show
7. Yogi Bear
6. Smurfs
5. Johnny Quest
4. The Jetsons
3. Tom and Jerry
2. Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!
1. The Flintstones
64. Felix the Cat (1958-1961)
63. Hey Arnold! (1996–2004)
62. Recess (1997–2003)
61. Snorks (1984–1988)
60. Goof Troop (1992–1993)
59. Rugrats (1991-1994; 1996-2004)
58. Dexter's Laboratory (1996–-1998; 2001–2003)
57. Bobby's World (1990–1998) Howie Mandel with a mullet, priceless.
56. Rocko's Modern Life (1993–1996)
55. The Angry Beavers (1997–2001)
54. Beetlejuice (1989–1991) Not nearly as good as the movie.
53. Taz-Mania (1991–1993)
52. Johnny Bravo (1997–2004)
51. Inspector Gadget (1983–1986)
50. Jim Henson's Muppet Babies (1984–1990)
49. The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack (2008-present) Stumbled upon this one day, I find it very funny, my wife finds it very weird.
48. The Magic School Bus (1994–1997) Kids show, and educational, yes; but, very charming.
47. Samurai Jack (2001-2004) Great animation.
46. TaleSpin (1990–1994)
45. Schoolhouse Rock! (1973-1986)
44. Voltron (1984–1985) Not nearly as good as Transformers.
43. The Tick (1994–1996) Spoon!
42. Space Ghost Coast to Coast (1994–2004) Hilarious.
41. Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids (1972–1984)
40. Garfield and Friends (1988–1994)
39. G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (1985–1986; 1989–1992)
38. DragonBallZ (1997-2003) Great action, when they actually get to the fighting, and stop talking.
37. Daria (1997–2002)
36. CatDog (1998–2002)
35. The Oblongs (2001-2004) Why so few episodes?
34. The Jetsons (1962-1963; 1984-1985 and 1987)
33. Heathcliff (1984-1987)
32. Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers (1989–1990)
31. Disney's Adventures of the Gummi Bears (1985–1990)
30. Justice League (2001-2004) Great action.
29. Dennis the Menace (1986–1988)
28. Alvin and the Chipmunks (1983–1990)
27. Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008-present) Real possibilities.
26. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987–1996)
25. DuckTales (1987–1990) I want to swim in a bank full of coins, so bad.
24. The Ren and Stimpy Show (1991–1996) Very odd, but that's what made it funny.
23. X-Men (1992–1997) Better than the movies?
22. Tiny Toon Adventures (1991–1994)
21. Family Guy (1999–2002; 2005–present) Used to be much better than it is now.
20. Arthur (1996–present) Yes, it's a kids show, but there is a LOT of hidden humor in it.
19. The Transformers (1984–1987)
18. He-Man and the Masters of the Universe (1983–1985)
17. Thundercats (1985–1989)
16. Avatar: The Last Airbender (2005-2008) Hope the movies turns out to be good.
15.The Smurfs (1981–1990)
14. Batman: The Animated Series (1992–1995) Awesome animation, very dark, but engaging.
13. Yogi Bear (1958–1988)
12. Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! (1969–1972)
11. SpongeBob SquarePants (1999-present) I think SpongeBob's facial expressions are one of the best parts of the show.
10. Beavis and Butt-head (1993–1997) So dumb it's funny.
9. Animaniacs (1993–1998) Classic skits, like Pinky and the Brain.
8. Futurama (1999–2003; 2008–present) Best character? Bender.
7. South Park (1997-present) Offends everyone equally.
6. The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show (1959–1973)
5. The Flintstones (1960–1966)
4. Tom and Jerry (1940-1958) Classic cat and mouse.
3. King of the Hill (1997–2009) Very dry sense of humor.
2. The Simpsons (1989–present) Modern day classic. Missed out on the top spot because some episodes haven't been so good (i.e. anything starring Lisa).
Hanna Barbara cartoons
1. Looney Tunes (1930-1969) Greatest cartoon of all time.
9. The Quick Draw McGraw Show
8. The Huckleberry Hound Show
7. Yogi Bear
6. Smurfs
5. Johnny Quest
4. The Jetsons
3. Tom and Jerry
2. Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!
1. The Flintstones
Monday, June 16, 2008
Top 30 anime
1. Cowboy Bebop & The movie
2. Full Metal Alchemist
3. Vision of Escaflowne
4. Death Note
5. Neon Genesis Evangelion & End of Evangelion & You Are [Not] Alone & You Can[not] Advance
6. Last Exile
7. Noein
8. Mushishi
9. Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex
10. Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex 2nd Gig
11. Gankutsuou: The Count of Monte Cristo
12. Haibane Renmei
13. Monster
14. Rahxephon
15. Moribito - Guardian of the Spirit
16. Gungrave
17. The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya season 1
18. Full Metal Panic
19. Full Metal Panic The 2nd Raid
20. Code Geass
21. Code Geass R2
22. Samurai Champloo
23. Clannad after story
24. Eureka Seven & Eureka Seven: Good Night, Sleep Tight, Young Lovers
25. Serial Experiments Lain
26. Kino’s Journey
27. Twelve Kingdoms
28. Toward the Terra
29. Wolf’s Rain
30. Revolutionary Girl Utena
References:
http://freetexthost.com/wf14gwth4m
2. Full Metal Alchemist
3. Vision of Escaflowne
4. Death Note
5. Neon Genesis Evangelion & End of Evangelion & You Are [Not] Alone & You Can[not] Advance
6. Last Exile
7. Noein
8. Mushishi
9. Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex
10. Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex 2nd Gig
11. Gankutsuou: The Count of Monte Cristo
12. Haibane Renmei
13. Monster
14. Rahxephon
15. Moribito - Guardian of the Spirit
16. Gungrave
17. The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya season 1
18. Full Metal Panic
19. Full Metal Panic The 2nd Raid
20. Code Geass
21. Code Geass R2
22. Samurai Champloo
23. Clannad after story
24. Eureka Seven & Eureka Seven: Good Night, Sleep Tight, Young Lovers
25. Serial Experiments Lain
26. Kino’s Journey
27. Twelve Kingdoms
28. Toward the Terra
29. Wolf’s Rain
30. Revolutionary Girl Utena
References:
http://freetexthost.com/wf14gwth4m
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
Megaupload is great for recessions!
Hurray! No spending multi-100$ for stupid games! I do! Actually, I wanted to try these games, but the Toyriffics don't have these and give and don't like me. These guys pirate at home so they probably already knew about megaupload. Well, these lesser known games are great. I got the beloved Radiant Silvergun and played that making pass the 2nd level (well known theme song in the 2nd level). The game store people told me that Albert Odyssey: Legend of Eldean was another big collectors item, because it's better then Shining Wisdom (direct sequel to Shining Force II), but much less rare than Panzer Dragoon Saga (played that too).
Oh and I bought Bangai-O (second Ebay purchase ever) with Uncle's help. I heard this game is amongst the most desired shooters on the Sega console which explains why Bangai-O Spirits for the Dual Screen came out. Only $50!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)